| Specifications | General Device Classification Questionnaire FDA-3429 HHS/PSC |
| Business section |

| Specifications | General Device Classification Questionnaire FDA-3429 HHS/PSC |
| Business section |

| Specifications | General Device Classification Questionnaire FDA-3429 HHS/PSC |
| Suggested Link Details/Purchase | |
| Content | Other (Specify) FORM FDA 3429 (1/09) FORM APPROVED: OMB NO. 0910-0138 EXPIRATION DATE: March 31, 2009 (See OMB Statement on Page 2) DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE - FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION GENERAL DEVICE CLASSIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE 1. IS THE DEVICE LIFE-SUSTAINING OR LIFE-SUPPORTING ? Go to Item 3. YESNO 6. IS THERE SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO ESTABLISH SPECIAL CONTROLS IN ADDITION TO GENERAL CONTROLS TO PROVIDE REASONABLE ASSURANCE OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS ? YESNOIf Yes, Classify in Class II and go to Item 7. If No, Classify in Class III. 8. IF A REGULATORY PERFORMANCE STANDARD IS NEEDED TO PROVIDE REASONABLE ASSURANCE OF THE SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF A CLASS II OR III DEVICE, IDENTIFY THE PRIORITY FOR ESTABLISHING SUCH A STANDARD. Low Priority Medium Priority High Priority Not Applicable 2. IS THE DEVICE FOR A USE WHICH IS OF SUBSTANTIAL IMPORTANCE IN PREVENTING IMPAIRMENT OF HUMAN HEALTH ? Guidance Document Performance Standard(s) Device Tracking Testing Guidelines 3. DOES THE DEVICE PRESENT A POTENTIAL UNREASONABLE RISK OF ILLNESS OR INJURY ? Go to Item 2. YESNO YES DATEPANEL MEMBER / PETITIONER GENERIC TYPE OF DEVICECLASSIFICATION RECOMMENDATION 9. FOR A DEVICE RECOMMENDED FOR RECLASSIFICATION INTO CLASS II, SHOULD THE RECOMMENDED REGULATORY PERFORMANCE STANDARD BE IN PLACE BEFORE THE RECLASSIFICATION TAKES EFFECT ? 10. FOR A DEVICE RECOMMENDED FOR CLASSIFICATION / RECLASSIFICATION INTO CLASS III, IDENTIFY THE PRIORITY FOR REQUIRING PREMARKET APPROVAL APPLICATION (PMA) SUBMISSIONS. Low Priority Medium Priority High Priority Not Applicable NOIf Yes, Classify in Class I. If No, go to Item 6. NOT Applicable YESNOGo to Item 4. 4. DID YOU ANSWER YES TO ANY OF THE ABOVE 3 QUESTIONS ?YESNOIf Yes, go to Item 6. If No, go to Item 5. NOYES 7. IF THERE IS SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO ESTABLISH SPECIAL CONTROLS TO PROVIDE REASONABLE ASSURANCE OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS IDENTIFY BELOW THE SPECIAL CONTROL(S) NEEDED TO PROVIDE SUCH REASONABLE ASSURANCE. FOR CLASS II. Page 1 PSC Graphics (301) 443-1090 EF 5. IS THERE SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO DETERMINE THAT GENERAL CONTROLS ARE SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE REASONABLE ASSURANCE OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS ? |
| Navigation | Previous Page / Next Page |
| Following Datasheets | UCM080872_1 (1 pages) ucm080879-1_1 (2 pages) UCM081561_1 (84 pages) UCM081575_1 (32 pages) UCM081600 (76 pages) UCM081603_1 (17 pages) UCM081667_1 (2 pages) UCM081671 (76 pages) UCM082348_1 (4 pages) UCM082359_1 (2 pages) |
Check in e-portals![]() |
World-H-News Products Extensions Partners Automation Jet Parts |
| Sitemap Folder | group1 group2 group3 group4 group5 group6 group7 group8 group9 group10 group11 group12 group13 group14 group15 group16 group17 group18 group19 group20 group21 group22 group23 group24 group25 group26 group27 group28 group29 group30 group31 group32 group33 group34 group35 group36 group37 group38 group39 group40 group41 group42 group43 group44 group45 group46 group47 group48 group49 group50 group51 group52 group53 group54 group55 group56 group57 group58 group59 group60 group61 group62 group63 group64 group65 group66 group67 group68 group69 group70 group71 group72 group73 group74 group75 group76 group77 group78 group79 group80 group81 group82 group83 group84 group85 group86 group87 group88 group89 group90 group91 group92 group93 group94 group95 group96 group97 group98 group99 group100 Prewious Folder Next Folder |