
Specifications | Layout Zaida |
Business section |
Specifications | Layout Zaida |
Suggested Link Details/Purchase | |
Content | WELDING RESEARCH OCTOBER 2002-S202 lidification process (Refs. 9–11). While in service, the brazed joint can be exposed to elevated temperatures over a long operat- ing time, causing potential phase changes in the joint and, in particular, at the inter- face between the base and filler metals. The properties of the interface reaction products can significantly affect joint per- formance. The long-term aging of brazed joints has not been extensively studied. Shimoo et al., assessed the kinetics of solid-state reactions between Si3N4and Ni (Ref. 12). Most aging studies have examined the in- terface microstructure that develops ini- tially between the molten filler metal and the base metal during the brazing process (Refs. 13–15). Several publications de- scribe high-temperature, interface reac- tions due to diffusion bonding processes (Refs. 16–18). Although the latter investi- gations provided important insights into potential solid-state reactions, the starting microstructures and aging conditions did not adequately represent those of brazed joints. The objective of the present inves- tigation was to study filler metal/base metal interactions that can occur in the brazements of heat engines. The investi- gation examined brazed joints made be- tween a low-temperature Ag-Cu-Ti filler metal and Thermo-Span™ or Inconel™ 718 substrate alloys; data from an analo- gous investigation of a high-melting-tem- perature Au-Ni-Ti braze alloy and Thermo-Span™, as well as an AISI Type 347 stainless steel, will be reported in Part 2. Standard analytical tools were used to characterize the brazed joint microstruc- tures. The four-point bend test was used to determine the effect of microstructure on joint mechanical performance. Experimental Procedures Materials: Base Metals The two base metals selected for this study were the precipitation-hardened Thermo-Span™ (24.5Ni-29.0Co-5.5Cr- 4.8Nb-(Si, Ti, Al)-bal. Fe wt-%) and In- conel™ 718 (55Ni-21Cr-5.5 (Nb+Ti)- 3.3Mo-bal. Fe alloys (Refs. 19, 20). The Thermo-Span™ was received in the solu- tion-annealed condition [1093°C (2000°F), 1 h, air cool]; the condition of the as-received Inconel™ 718 stock was not documented. In order to assure con- sistent material properties, the Inconel™ 718 alloy was subjected to a solution an- nealing treatment. The Thermo-Span™ and Inconel™ 718 materials were then ex- posed to an aging (precipitation-anneal) heat treatment. The condition of each base metal was assessed using Rockwell C (HRC) hardness measurements. Six mea- surements were performed on three sam- ple blanks. The heat treatment schedules and hardness data follow. Thermo-Span™ (As-received HRC= 23±2, solution annealed). Solution an- nealing (at the mill): hold at 1093°C (2000°F) for 1 h; air cooling. Precipitation annealing: holding at 718°C (1324°F) for 8 h; furnace cooling at 0.015°C/s (0.027°F/s) to 621°C (1150°F); hold at 621°C (1150°F) for 8 h; air cooling. Postheat treatment HRC= 39±1. Inconel™ 718 (as-received HRC= 22.5±0.5, unknown condition). Solution annealing: hold at 954°to 1010°C (1750°to 1850°F) for 0.5 to 1 h, air cooling. Precip- itation annealing: hold at 718°C (1324°F) for 8 h, furnace cooling to 621°C (1150°F), holding for 10 h, air cooling. Postheat treatment HRC= 42±2. All brazing experiments were per- formed on base alloy surfaces that had been ground to a nominal √32 finish as de- termined by profilometer measurements. Four profilometer traces, two in one di- rection and the other two in a perpendic- ular direction, were made over a distance of 6 mm on each of duplicate samples. The arithmetic average roughness, or RA numbers (mean and ±one standard devi- ation) are shown in Table 1. The solution and aging heat treatments caused both substrate materials to have a lower surface roughness after grinding as compared to that of the as-received material. Materials: Brazing Filler Metals The brazing filler metal Cusil™ ABA (63.3Ag-35.1Cu-1.6Ti) was evaluated in this study (Ref. 21). The filler metal was in the form of 0.051-mm-thick (0.002-in.) strip. The Ag-Cu-Ti alloy has a nominal melting range of 780°to 815°C (1436°to 1499°F). The composition of the material batch used in this study was verified by atomic emission spectroscopy (AES); the chemical composition was 61.8±4.2 Cu, 35.1±0.7 Ag, and 1.7 Ti (wt-%). The chemical analysis was performed in tripli- cate; the error terms represent a 95% confidence interval. The onset (solidus) temperature of the Ag-Cu-Ti alloy was Fig. 1 — Configurations of the test specimen. Fig. 2 — Schematic diagram of the sessile drop test specimen used to assess filler metal wetting and spreading. The quantitative metric is the contact angle, θ. The symbol r is the effective spread radius assuming a circular footprint to the area of spread, and h is the height of the filler metal mound. Table 1 — Arithmetic Average Roughness (RA) of the Base Metal Specimens with a √32 Finish Base MetalConditionRA (µm) Thermo-Span™Solution treated0.19 ±0.02 Thermo-Span™Solution treated and aged0.09 ±0.02 Inconel™ 718As-received0.12 ±0.03 Inconel™ 718Solution treated and aged0.034 ±0.005 Note: Surface Profilometry Data (Med. Scan Speed) Fig. 3 — Time and temperature parameters for the Ag-Cu-Ti brazing process. |
Navigation | Previous Page / Next Page |
Suggested Link Details/Purchase | |
Following Datasheets | 10-2002-XIE-s (8 pages) 10-2003-COLLINS-s (8 pages) 10-2003-GOULD-s (5 pages) 10-2003-MENDEZ-s (11 pages) 10-2003-SOLOMON-s-1 (10 pages) 10-2003-VIANCO-s (10 pages) 10-2004-KIMAPONG-s (6 pages) 10-2004-MURUGANANTH-s (10 pages) 10-2004-WANG-s (5 pages) 10-2005-JENKINS-s (8 pages) |
Check in e-portals![]() |
World-H-News Products Extensions Partners Automation Jet Parts |
Sitemap Folder | group1 group2 group3 group4 group5 group6 group7 group8 group9 group10 group11 group12 group13 group14 group15 group16 group17 group18 group19 group20 group21 group22 group23 group24 group25 group26 group27 group28 group29 group30 group31 group32 group33 group34 group35 group36 group37 group38 group39 group40 group41 group42 group43 group44 group45 group46 group47 group48 group49 group50 group51 group52 group53 group54 group55 group56 group57 group58 group59 group60 group61 group62 group63 group64 group65 group66 group67 group68 group69 group70 group71 group72 group73 group74 group75 group76 group77 group78 group79 group80 group81 group82 group83 group84 group85 group86 group87 group88 group89 group90 group91 group92 group93 group94 group95 group96 group97 group98 group99 group100 Prewious Folder Next Folder |